|
Cell Phone Companies Continue Getting Penalized for Early
Termination Fees
Cell phone customers are continuing their battles against
individual cell phone providers who charge exorbitant amounts
for early termination fees, according to the Mercury News.
There are numerous lawsuits currently going on and being filed
all around the United States. In this latest lawsuit, Californians
in the Bay Area won a suit filed against the Sprint Nextel
company.
In addition to Sprint Nextel having to pay former customers
an $18.2 million settlement, the judge in the case ruled that
Sprint’s early cancellation fees were a violation of
California state law.
The Mercury News goes on to admit that the case may be appealed
– in fact, the chances of that are entirely likely.
All the same, the fact that these pricey fees were declared
illegal will undoubtedly have an affect on similar lawsuits
already taking place, not to mention all of those which may
be filed in the future.
In addition to the settlement and the ruling about the legality
– or lack thereof – of these fees, the judge in
question also told Sprint Nextel in no uncertain terms that
the company needs to quit attempting to get payment from any
customers who yet to pay the fees they were charged for cancelling
their contracts early. Up to this point, Sprint Nextel was
trying to get $54.7 million out of former wireless customers.
Not only is an appeal a huge possibility, but there is some
question about whether the judge’s ruling will stand
at all. The Federal Communications Commission, says the Mercury
News, is thinking about enacting a rule which says that early
termination charges can only be regulated by federal authorities.
There is really no question that such a decree would be firmly
backed by the wireless industry as a whole. This begs the
question about how the FCC intends to help unhappy consumers.
The sheer volume of similar lawsuits taking place clearly
suggests that the problem is becoming very widespread.
The good news is that a lot of people believe that, should
the FCC announce such a decree, it will be overturned. Something
needs to happen. Even those not involved in this particular
lawsuit – or any other suit associated with termination
fees – are thrilled with the results. Given the fact
that the government is not subjected to early termination
fees, it does seem like allowing states to have a say in regulations
would be fairer to consumers.
(July 23, 2008)
|